Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 9, Issue 1, 2019
Pages: 7 - 7
None of above
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 10
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 09.10.2019. None of above

ART AS A RESULT OF THE IDEOLOGY OF POWER

By
Dragana Rađenović
Dragana Rađenović

Department for Architecture – Scene design, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Abstract

Is the war over? Is its success measured by the number of victims or the consequences it has caused? Is art the only winner of any war because it is the only one showing both sides of the coin? It is ideologically colored, but not conflicted. It is rebellious, but not destructive. It is a luxury of leisured, but not just the empty decoration. It is a living ideology, but not politics. Philosopher Jacques Rancière claims "Art is an act of collective intelligence that should not be politically active. Artists should be at aesthetic distance because there is virtually no art outside the gallery institution." However, Lucy Lipard clarifies "There is no neutral zone. Every artist must ideologically choose, otherwise they will be manipulated." However, artist Alfred Jaar states that there is a huge gap between reality and its presentation. It is the artist who fills this void with intellectual and creative engagement.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.