Home Program
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 15, 2026
Pages: 120 - 120
Abstract
Other Editor: Darjana Sredić
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 7
PDF Downloads: 3
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 20.04.2026. >> Accepted: 20.04.2026. >> Published: 29.05.2026. Abstract Other Editor: Darjana Sredić

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION, WELL BEING, AND PROFESSIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN SLOVENIA (2022–2026)

By
Anton Vorina Orcid logo ,
Anton Vorina
Contact Anton Vorina

Abitura, d.o.o., Lava 7, 3000 Celje, Slovenia, , Abitura, d.o.o., Lava 7, 3000 Celje, Slovenia, Slovenia

Tina Vorina Orcid logo ,
Tina Vorina

Faculty of medicine, University of Maribor Slovenia

Svit Vorina Orcid logo ,
Svit Vorina

Faculty of Health Science, University of Maribor Slovenia

Vid Vorina Orcid logo ,
Vid Vorina

Lava Gymnasium, Celje School Center Slovenia

Ivanka Oberman
Ivanka Oberman

European Faculty of Law, New University Slovenia

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), especially generative artificial intelligence (GAI), is quickly changing education, work, and everyday life. Slovenia is an interesting example for studying these changes because it has adopted GAI very rapidly and there is already a growing number of empirical studies on its social and organisational impacts.

This paper provides a systematic review of Slovenian research published between 2022 and 2026. It organises the findings into key themes, including how GAI is adopted, trust in institutions, subjective well-being, work engagement, and leadership.

By examining national surveys, quantitative studies, and policy reports, the review shows that GAI has spread faster than most other digital technologies in Slovenia’s recent history. Although its use is now very common, its effects on people’s well-being and work life are complex and sometimes mixed. While general life satisfaction remains quite stable, the impact at work depends on whether employees see AI as a helpful tool or as an extra burden.

The study also found that trust in AI systems depends largely on algorithmic literacy. People with higher technical skills tend to be more critical towards AI. In many sectors, the results suggest that important human skills — such as empathy, ethical judgement, and mentoring — cannot be replaced by automated systems.

The paper emphasises the need for human-centred governance of GAI and better digital skills for everyone. It also calls for long-term studies to better understand the lasting effects of AI on Slovenian society.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.