Home Program
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 15, 2026
Pages: 105 - 105
Abstract
Psychology Editor: Dejan Kojic
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 4
PDF Downloads: 3
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 12.05.2026. >> Accepted: 14.05.2026. >> Published: 29.05.2026. Abstract Psychology Editor: Dejan Kojic

INDICATORS OF AGGRESSIVENESS ON PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSONALITY INVENTORIES

By
Snežana Samardžić
Snežana Samardžić
Contact Snežana Samardžić

JZU Special Hospital for Psychiatry Sokolac, JZU Special Hospital for Psychiatry Sokolac , Sokolac , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Man, since the earliest times, established two taboos: the taboo of incest and the taboo of killing, which shows how much importance has always been attached to aggressive behavior and destruction. When we talk about aggression and its motivation and consequences, it should be emphasized that it is the subject of interest primarily in forensics, but lately it has also been investigated in the framework of neuropsychological and neurobiological works. Unlike benign aggression, which has a biologically adaptive function and is characteristic of both humans and animals, malignant aggression can be "wrapped" in various forms and forms of violent behavior with the aim of satisfying the aggressor and characteristically occurs only in humans. The paper discusses the very concept of aggression and its indicators on two personality inventories, which have recently been more intensively used in psychological psychodiagnostic work: PAI and MCMI III.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.