Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2014
Pages: 1 - 4
None of above
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 10
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 01.10.2014. None of above

MAKING THE CHOICE OF A BUSINESS STRATEGY WHICH WILL BE STIMULATING FOR EMPLOYEES

By
Mirjana Radović-Marković ,
Mirjana Radović-Marković

Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship

Dragica Jovančević ,
Dragica Jovančević

Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship

Sladjana Vujičić
Sladjana Vujičić

Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship

Abstract

Motivation is a learned skill. It requires the understanding of not only the desires of subordinates, but the biases of those charged with steering the organization which the subordinates serve. This design permits an unbiased approach toward developing goals that not only continue to motivate but serve to meet any organization’s long standing goals. Motivation is one of the most effective strategies to increase productivity and satisfaction in the workplace. Motivation can be challenging when employees belong to different generations, since different generations have different incentives and opportunities. In this paper we present some of the current strategies to motivate employees from younger generations in the current present environment, where the majority of the workforce is occupied by Baby boomers. Our paper is especially focused on the importance of creating a future strategy, designed to motivate employees once the Baby boomers leave the workforce.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.