Home Program
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 14, 2025
Pages: 21 - 27
Review Scientific Paper
Ecology, Energy Efficiency and Green Energy Editor: Darjana Sredić
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 474
PDF Downloads: 429
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 14.08.2025. >> Accepted: 12.09.2025. >> Published: 21.11.2025. Review Scientific Paper Ecology, Energy Efficiency and Green Energy Editor: Darjana Sredić

THE ROLE OF ECOLOGICAL FACTORS IN FREE-RANGE ANIMAL FARMING: IMPLICATIONS FOR FEASIBILITY AND ANIMAL WELFARE

By
Milena Milojević Orcid logo ,
Milena Milojević

Unit for Agricultural and Business Studies and Tourism, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Šabac , Serbia

Suzana Knežević Orcid logo ,
Suzana Knežević
Contact Suzana Knežević

Unit for Agricultural and Business Studies and Tourism, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Šabac , Serbia

Maja Došenović Marinković Orcid logo ,
Maja Došenović Marinković

Unit for Agricultural and Business Studies and Tourism, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Šabac , Serbia

Goran Stanišić Orcid logo
Goran Stanišić

Unit for Agricultural and Business Studies and Tourism, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Šabac , Serbia

Abstract

Ecological conditions play a crucial role in the success and sustainability of free-range animal farming. Factors such as climate, vegetation, water availability, and terrain directly influence not only the feasibility of managing animals in open or semi-open systems but also the quality of their welfare. In restrictive environments like cages or small enclosures, animal welfare is often compromised due to lack of space, limited stimulation, and inability to express natural behaviors. Although such systems allow for easier management and safety, they rarely meet the animals’ biological needs. In contrast, free-range and semi-free systems offer animals access to more natural habitats, promoting physical health, mental stimulation, and natural behaviors such as grazing, roaming, and social interaction. However, these systems require careful ecological planning, as poor environmental conditions can lead to health issues, resource scarcity, and increased human–animal conflict. Ensuring animal welfare in free-range farming depends on aligning management practices with environmental conditions and species-specific needs. Proper oversight, sufficient resources, and ecological compatibility are essential to create systems that are both ethically responsible and practically viable. Ultimately, ecological factors are foundational to designing humane, functional, and sustainable free-range animal farming systems.

References

Bastani, M., Sadeghipour, A., Kamali, N., Zarafshar, M., & Bazot, S. (2023). How does livestock graze management affect woodland soil health? Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, 1028149. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1028149
Broom, D. M. (1991). Animal welfare: concepts and measurement2. Journal of Animal Science, 69(10), 4167–4175. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69104167x
Broom, D. M. (2011). A history of animal welfare science. Acta Biotheoretica, 59(2), 121–137.
Council of the European Union. . (1998). Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. . Official Journal of the European Communities, L221, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.6
Diverio, S., Menchetti, L., Riggio, G., Azzari, C., Iaboni, M., Zasso, R., Di Mari, W., & Santoro, M. M. (2017). Dogs’ coping styles and dog-handler relationships influence avalanche search team performance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 191, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.005

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.