Home Proceedings Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 14, 2025
Pages: 21 - 27
Review Scientific Paper
Ecology, Energy Efficiency and Green Energy Editor: Darjana Sredić
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 62
PDF Downloads: 31
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 14.08.2025. >> Accepted: 12.09.2025. >> Published: 21.11.2025. Review Scientific Paper Ecology, Energy Efficiency and Green Energy Editor: Darjana Sredić

THE ROLE OF ECOLOGICAL FACTORS IN FREE-RANGE ANIMAL FARMING: IMPLICATIONS FOR FEASIBILITY AND ANIMAL WELFARE

By
Milena Milojević Orcid logo ,
Milena Milojević

Unit for Agricultural and Business Studies and Tourism, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Šabac , Serbia

Suzana Knežević Orcid logo ,
Suzana Knežević
Contact Suzana Knežević

Unit for Agricultural and Business Studies and Tourism, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Šabac , Serbia

Maja Došenović Marinković Orcid logo ,
Maja Došenović Marinković

Unit for Agricultural and Business Studies and Tourism, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Šabac , Serbia

Goran Stanišić Orcid logo
Goran Stanišić

Unit for Agricultural and Business Studies and Tourism, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac, Academy of Applied Studies Šabac , Šabac , Serbia

Abstract

Ecological conditions play a crucial role in the success and sustainability of free-range animal farming. Factors such as climate, vegetation, water availability, and terrain directly influence not only the feasibility of managing animals in open or semi-open systems but also the quality of their welfare. In restrictive environments like cages or small enclosures, animal welfare is often compromised due to lack of space, limited stimulation, and inability to express natural behaviors. Although such systems allow for easier management and safety, they rarely meet the animals’ biological needs. In contrast, free-range and semi-free systems offer animals access to more natural habitats, promoting physical health, mental stimulation, and natural behaviors such as grazing, roaming, and social interaction. However, these systems require careful ecological planning, as poor environmental conditions can lead to health issues, resource scarcity, and increased human–animal conflict. Ensuring animal welfare in free-range farming depends on aligning management practices with environmental conditions and species-specific needs. Proper oversight, sufficient resources, and ecological compatibility are essential to create systems that are both ethically responsible and practically viable. Ultimately, ecological factors are foundational to designing humane, functional, and sustainable free-range animal farming systems.

References

Bastani, M., Sadeghipour, A., Kamali, N., Zarafshar, M., & Bazot, S. (2023). How does livestock graze management affect woodland soil health? Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, 1028149. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1028149
Broom, D. M. (1991). Animal welfare: concepts and measurement2. Journal of Animal Science, 69(10), 4167–4175. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69104167x
Broom, D. M. (2011). A history of animal welfare science. Acta Biotheoretica, 59(2), 121–137.
Council of the European Union. . (1998). Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. . Official Journal of the European Communities, L221, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.6
Diverio, S., Menchetti, L., Riggio, G., Azzari, C., Iaboni, M., Zasso, R., Di Mari, W., & Santoro, M. M. (2017). Dogs’ coping styles and dog-handler relationships influence avalanche search team performance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 191, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.005
Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare: The science in its cultural context. Wiley-Blackwell.
Fregonesi, J. A. (1999). Production and behaviour of dairy cattle in different housing systems.
Fregonesi, J. A., Tucker, C. B., & Weary, D. M. (2007). Freestall housing: Effects on dairy cattle behavior. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(9), 3879–3884.
Gehring, T. M., VerCauteren, K. C., & Landry, J. M. (2011). Utility of an Electric Fence for Reducing Livestock Depredation by Coyotes and Wolves. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 35(3), 291–298.
Grandin, T. (2015). Improving animal welfare: A practical approach. CABI.
Hemsworth, P. H., & Coleman, G. J. (2010). Human-livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity and welfare of intensively farmed animals. CABI.
Hou, D., Liu, J., Li, N., Han, B., Liu, C., & Wang, Z. (2024). Grazing exclusion is more effective for vegetation restoration and nutrient transfer in the heavily degraded desert steppe. BMC Plant Biology, 24(1), 408. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05127-z
Hristov, S., & Relić, R. (2009). Ocena uslova smeštaja sa osvrtom na dobrobit krava. Zbornik Naučnih Radova, 15(3–4), 79–84.
Hristov, S., Vučinić, M., Relić, R., & Stanković, B. (2006). Uslovi gajenja, dobrobit i ponašanje farmskih životinja. Biotehnologija u Stočarstvu, 22, 73–84.
Kvesić, M. (2016). Ponašanje svinja u otvorenom i zatvorenom sustavu držanja.
Linnell, J. D. C., Salvatori, V., & Boitani, L. (2008). Guidelines for Population Level Management Plans for Large Carnivores in Europe. A Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe Report.
Manteca, X., Main, D. C., & Temple, D. (2021). Animal welfare: New opportunities for animal production in the 21st century. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 630299.
Miao, Z. H., Glatz, P. C., & Ru, Y. J. (n.d.). Review of Production, Husbandry and Sustainability of Free-range Pig Production Systems. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 17(11), 1615–1634. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.1615
Milazzo, F., Francksen, R. M., Abdalla, M., Ravetto Enri, S., Zavattaro, L., Pittarello, M., Hejduk, S., Newell-Price, P., Schils, R. L. M., Smith, P., & Vanwalleghem, T. (n.d.). An Overview of Permanent Grassland Grazing Management Practices and the Impacts on Principal Soil Quality Indicators. Agronomy, 13(5), 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051366
Mississippi State University Extension Service . (2023). Pasture and Grazing Management Under Drought Conditions.
OIE – World Organisation for Animal Health. . (2023). Animal welfare. .
Petersen, V., Recén, B., & Vestergaard, K. (1990). Behaviour of sows and piglets during farrowing under free-range conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 26(1–2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90090-Q
Petrović, M., Rakonjac, S., Bogdanović, V., Bogosavljević-Bošković, S., Đoković, R., Dosković, V., & Petrović, M. (2018). Ponašanje, dobrobit i zaštita životinja u organskom stočarstvu.
Pettersson, I. C., Freire, R., & Nicol, C. J. (2016). Factors affecting ranging behaviour in commercial free-range hens. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 72(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043933915002664
Plokhikh, R., Shokparova, D., Fodor, G., Berghauer, S., Tóth, A., Suymukhanov, U., Zhakupova, A., Varga, I., Zhu, K., & Dávid, L. D. (n.d.). Towards Sustainable Pasture Agrolandscapes: A Landscape-Ecological-Indicative Approach to Environmental Audits and Impact Assessments. Sustainability, 15(8), 6913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086913
Regan, T. (1983). The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press.
Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation. New York: HarperCollins.
Singh, M., & Cowieson, A. J. (2013). Range use and pasture consumption in free-range poultry production. Animal Production Science, 53(11), 1202. https://doi.org/10.1071/an13199
Stadig, L. M., Rodenburg, T. B., Ampe, B., Reubens, B., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2017). Effect of free-range access, shelter type and weather conditions on free-range use and welfare of slow-growing broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 192, 15–23.
Sustainable Food Systems Journal . (2024). Enhancing irrigated forage crop production through water and nutrient management in the Ethiopian sub-humid highlands. .
University of Saskatchewan – Livestock and Forage Centre of Excellence . (2023). Managing through Drought. .
Utah State University Extension . (2023). Deficit Irrigation of Pastures. .
van Eeden, L. M., Eklund, A., Miller, J. R. B., López-Bao, J. V., Chapron, G., Cejtin, M. R., Crowther, M. S., Dickman, C. R., Frank, J., Krofel, M., Macdonald, D. W., McManus, J., Meyer, T. K., Middleton, A. D., Newsome, T. M., Ripple, W. J., Ritchie, E. G., Schmitz, O. J., Stoner, K. J., … Treves, A. (n.d.). Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection. PLOS Biology, 16(9), e2005577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005577
Zakon o dobrobiti životinja. . (2009). Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije, br. 41/2009.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.