Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 5, Issue 4, 2015
Pages: 96 - 104
None of above
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 5
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 01.10.2015. None of above

MODELINGOFEGOVERNMENTBUSINESSPROCESSES ACCORDINGTO BPMLSPECIFICATION AND ISO82045 –THE USE CASE OF REQUEST FOR DIGITAL CERTIFICATE

By
Milan Latinović ,
Milan Latinović

Agency for Information Society of Republic of Srpska , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Branko Milosavljević ,
Branko Milosavljević

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Miroslav Zarić
Miroslav Zarić

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Abstract

Public administration institutions focus on constant implementation of new technologies trough separated ICT projects. In most cases, these projects consider simple implementation of ICT technology on current business process without consideration if these processes needs modification in order to accept new technology. Because of this, result might not satisfy end-user needs. This paper proposes approach where processes are first modelled according to BPMN specification and metadata is defined according ISO 82045 standard. Only after this kind of preparation, we can ensure that implementation of ICT technologies will satisfy end user needs. This paper also provides use cases of modelled processes in order to assist anyone who decides to lead ICT projects in this manner.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.