Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 8, Issue 1, 2018
Pages: 75 - 75
None of above
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 7
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 09.10.2018. None of above

Secondary prevention of mobing

By
Vesna Rodic ,
Vesna Rodic
Brana Komljenovic
Brana Komljenovic
Abstract

When mobbing has already begun, it may be difficult to keep it under control if immediate action is not taken. Trusted advisers and mediators can play a very important role. To intervene early, the supervisor must be able to read the first signs of mobbing process in development. Top management can be to appoint one or more persons in the organization, where employees according to which place mobbing activities can turn to for advice. It is important that the management top of the company authorize one person, which would enable it to become active in one case. Case studies so far have shown very clearly that inactivity at these levels also includes a supervisor who is very unsure of his organizational role in such a conflict. Company policy should also provide clear information about it.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.