This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Headquarters for Fight and against Terrorism and Extremism, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Republic of Srpska , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Provincial Protector of Citizens – Ombudsman , Novi Sad , Serbia
The basic aim of the criminal procedure is to establish the truth. It should be acknowledged that the most appropriate time to do this work is before the main trial because, as determined by the police or the prosecutor, it often has a higher real value than the material that was later established in the courtroom. On the other hand, one of the more important features of the contemporary science of criminal procedural law, and therefore contemporary criminal procedural legislation, whose solutions follow the tendencies of science, is the requirement for the efficiency of the criminal justice system. The question of the effectiveness of the criminal procedure, that is, the treatment, is an issue that has always attracted the attention of not only the scientific and professional public, but also the public at large, especially for the last decade. The request for the efficiency of the criminal procedure has become one of the more important features of modern criminal law science, and therefore modern criminal procedural legislation whose solutions follow the tendency of science. It is, quite justified, one of the international legal standards of this area as a whole. The author discusses the simplified assessment of the forms in the criminal assessment of the law of the Republic of Srpska related to the achievement of the appropriate level of efficiency in criminal proceedings in the Republic of Srpska.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
