Home Program
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 15, 2026
Pages: 45 - 45
Abstract
Law Sciences Editor: Dejan Kojic
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 8
PDF Downloads: 4
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 19.03.2026. >> Accepted: 21.03.2026. >> Abstract Law Sciences Editor: Dejan Kojic

THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON LEGAL PRACTICE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA-CHALLENGES, ADVANTAGES AND DIRECTIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT.

By
Radošević Snježana
Radošević Snježana
Contact Radošević Snježana

Republika Srpska Pension and Disability Insurance Fund, Republika Srpska Pension and Disability Insurance Fund, , Bijeljina , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of digital transformation on legal practice in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It analyses how technological advances, including artificial intelligence (AI), digital case management systems and online legal databases, affect the efficiency, accessibility and quality of legal services. A qualitative methodology is applied, included interviews with legal professionals, analysis of legal technology implementation and a review of relevant literature. The paper highlights the benefits of digitalization, such as accelerated case management, improved communication with clients, easier access to legal information and improved legal research capabilities, but also challenges such as security risks, data protection, resistance to new technologies and the need for additional training. Finally, recommendations areprovided for legal institutions and policymakers to ensure the effective and ethical integration of digital tools into legal practice.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.