Home Program
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 15, 2026
Pages: 49 - 49
Abstract
Law Sciences Editor: Darjana Sredić
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 6
PDF Downloads: 3
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 17.05.2026. >> Accepted: 19.05.2026. >> Published: 29.05.2026. Abstract Law Sciences Editor: Darjana Sredić

TECHNOLOGICAL EXCLUSION AND THE REALIZATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN DIGITALIZED SOCIAL PROTECTION

By
Draško Gajić Orcid logo
Draško Gajić
Contact Draško Gajić

Faculty of Political Science, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The digitalization of social protection is increasingly presented as an instrument for improving the efficiency, accessibility and transparency of public services. However, when access to social rights becomes predominantly mediated by digital platforms, electronic procedures, databases and automated forms of decision-making, new forms of exclusion may emerge. This paper analyzes technological exclusion as a human rights issue within digitalized social protection systems. It focuses on the position of users who lack digital skills, stable internet access, adequate devices, accessible digital interfaces or institutional support in navigating digital procedures. Special attention is given to the risks that digital transformation may create for older persons, persons with disabilities, people living in poverty, rural populations and other socially vulnerable groups. The paper discusses the relationship between administrative modernization and the effective realization of human rights, particularly the principles of equality, non-discrimination, accessibility, privacy, transparency and the right to an effective remedy. The central argument is that digitalization should not replace the substantive accessibility of social protection, but should function as an additional and socially sensitive channel for exercising rights. The paper concludes that digitalized social protection requires human rights safeguards, non-digital alternatives and institutional mechanisms that prevent technological exclusion from becoming a new form of social inequality.

Data Availability

Рад је заснован на анализи доступне научне, стручне и нормативне литературе. У раду нису коришћени нови емпиријски подаци, па посебна база података није формирана.

Conflict of Interest

Аутор изјављује да нема сукоб интереса у вези са припремом, пријавом и могућим објављивањем овог рада.

Funding Statement

Овај рад није финансиран из посебног пројекта, гранта или другог екстерног извора финансирања.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.