Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 1, Issue 1, 2012
Pages: 877 - 898
None of above
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 12
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 29.09.2012. None of above

STRATEGIC PLANNING IN INTEGRATED MODEL OF BSC AND HOSHIN PERFORMANCE MAMAGEMENT

By
Tamara Gvozdenović ,
Tamara Gvozdenović

Hydro Power Plants on the Trebišnjica , Trebinje , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Predrag Pravdić ,
Predrag Pravdić

Faculty of mechanical engineering Kragujevac-industrial engineering, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Veselin Savić ,
Veselin Savić

Opština Trebinje , Trebinje , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dragan Popović
Dragan Popović

Jahorina osiguranje a.d. Pale Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

In pursuit of excellence in business performance and long-term profits, strategic planning and Hoshin management have been widely implemented as strategic management tools for some time. In recent years, the Balanced Scorecard ( BSC ) has also been gaining in popularity. Some organisations have been implementing these three management systems simultaneously. This paper compares and contrasts strategic planning, Hoshin management and BSC. Although differences exist, these strategic-management systems can be integrated on the basis of the features they share in common. Because each system has its shortcomings, the combination of the differences can overcome the individual weaknesses of each methodology. This paper presents theoretical side of an integrated model of strategic planning, BSC and Hoshin management.

 

References

Anderson, T. J. (n.d.). Strategic planning, autonomous actions and corporate performance. *Long Range Planning, 33, 184–200.
Andrews, K. (n.d.). *The concept of corporate strategy*.
Bach, N., P., C., & M, C. (n.d.). Marketing residential grid-connected PV systems using a balanced scorecard as a marketing tool. *Renewable Energy, 22*(1-3, 211–216.
Barney, J. B. (n.d.). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. *Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
Bechtell, M. L. (n.d.). Navigating organizational waters with Hoshin planning. *Journal of Organizational Excellence, 15*(2, 23–42.
Bojnec, S., & Latruffe, L. (n.d.). Measures of farm business efficiency. *Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108*(2, 258–270.
Butler, A., Letza, S. R., & Neale, B. (n.d.). Linking the Balanced Scorecard to strategy. *Long Range Planning, 30*(2, 242–253.
Clark, P. (n.d.). The Balanced Scorecard. *Accountancy Ireland, 29*(3, 25–26.
Epstein, M., & Manzoni, J. F. (n.d.). Implementing corporate strategy: from tableaux de bord to Balanced Scorecards. *European Management Journal, 16*(2, 190–203.
Glaister, K. W., & Falshaw, J. R. (n.d.). Strategic planning: still going strong? *Long Range Planning, 32*(1, 107–116.
Grant, R. M. (n.d.). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. *California Management Review, 33*(3, 114–135.
Hasan, H., & Tibbilts, H. (n.d.). Strategic management of electronic commerce: An adaptation of balanced scorecard. *Internet Research, 10*(5, 439–450.
Kaplan, R. S., & D.P, N. (n.d.-a). Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. *Harvard Business Review, 78*(5, 167–176.
Kaplan, R. S., & D.P, N. (n.d.-b). Strategic learning and the Balanced Scorecard. *Strategy and Leadership, 24*(5, 18–24.
Kaplan, R. S., & D.P, N. (n.d.-c). *Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes*.
Kaplan, R. S., & D.P, N. (n.d.-d). The Balanced Scorecard: translating strategy into action.
Kaplan, R. S., & D.P, N. (n.d.-e). The Balanced Scorecard-measures that drive performance. *Harvard Business Review, 70*(1, 71–79.
Kaplan, R. S., & D.P, N. (n.d.-f). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part I. *Accounting Horizons, 15*(1, 87–104.
Kaplan, R. S., & D.P, N. (n.d.-g). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part II. *Accounting Horizons, 15*(2, 147–160.
Kaplan, R. S., & D.P, N. (n.d.-h). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system. *Harvard Business Review, 74*(1, 75–85.
Kondo, Y. (n.d.). Hoshin Kanri-A participative way of quality management in Japan. *The TQM Magazine, 10*(6, 425–432.
Lee, R. G., & Dale, B. G. (n.d.). Policy deployment: an examination of the theory. *International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 15*(5, 520–534.
Neely, A., Adams, C., & Kennerley, M. (n.d.). *The performance prism: the scorecard for measuring and managing business success*.
Phusavat, K., & Kanchana, R. (n.d.). Competitive priorities for service providers: Perspectives from Thailand. *Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108*(1, 5–21.
Porter, M. E. (n.d.-a). Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. *Harvard Business Review, 70*(5, 65–82.
Porter, M. E. (n.d.-b). *Competitive strategy*.
Prahalad, C. K., & Harmel, G. (n.d.). The core competence of the corporation. *Harvard Business Review, 68*(3, 79–81.
Prajogo, D. I. (n.d.). The relationship between competitive strategies and product quality. *Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107*(1, 69–83.
Soltani, E., Lai, P. C., & Mahmoudi, V. (n.d.). Managing change initiatives: Fantasy or reality? The case of public sector organizations. *Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18*(1, 153–179.
Yang, C. C. (n.d.). *Hoshin management*.
(n.d.-a). *Strategic management.
(n.d.-b). The tenuous link between formal strategic planning and financial performance. *Academy of Management Review, 12*(4, 658–675.
(N.d.-c). Business Excellence, Inc, 10 07.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.