Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2016
Pages: 39 - 39
None of above
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 8
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 11.11.2016. None of above

Modelling pressure rolling of asymmetric rolling process

By
V Alexa ,
V Alexa

Department of Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara, University Politehnica Timisoara , Hunedoara , Romania

S A Ratiu ,
S A Ratiu

Department of Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara, University Politehnica Timisoara , Hunedoara , Romania

I Kiss ,
I Kiss

Department of Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara, University Politehnica Timisoara , Hunedoara , Romania

V G Cioata
V G Cioata

Department of Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara, University Politehnica Timisoara , Hunedoara , Romania

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative analysis between experimental results and modelling in order to interpret the value of the contact pressure on the asymmetric longitudinal rolling. It is also intended action and the different behaviour of upper cylinder compared to the lower cylinder action in situations when both are driven, or only one operates. In the modelling will be presented on the basis of boundary conditions imposed rolling pressure variation in the degree of reduction and also re size arc length of contact. Determining a curve is also important to determine the locus of points which characterize symmetry conditions partial rolling process between unequal diameters cylinders.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.