Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 14, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 160 - 160
Original scientific paper
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 13
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 09.06.2024. Original scientific paper

RTRS AND BNRTV - MASS MEDIA THAT SHAPE REALITY OR INFORM THE PUBLIC

By
Sandra Đukanović
Sandra Đukanović

Vendom d.o.o , Laktaši , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

 According to multiple consecutive studies made by TV station viewership measurement agencies, BNRTV (Radio Television BN) and RTRS (Radio Television of Republika Srpska) represent the most watched and influential mass media in Republic of Srpska. The aim of the research conducted within this study is to demonstrate, through comparative analysis (particularly focusing on the media's informative functions), how the two most watched television stations in Republic of Srpska deliver information and news to the public. Special attention is devoted to agenda-setting and the concept of framing in media, which involves selecting which part of the information will be considered more prominent. Based on the research (tracking of the main news programs of both television stations in past four years with an emphasis on 7 days in may ,2024), the conclusion was drawn that there is a significant influence of agenda-setting and media framing in the media reporting of RTRS and BNRTV. It is evident in the agenda-setting of both television stations that bias in reporting (visibility bias) as well as bias in filtering (selective bias or bias in selection) are easily observable. The research also revealed that both television stations have their own regularities in setting the agenda, leading to very little overlap in the agenda, especially when it comes to emphasizing the importance of certain news items. 

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.