Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 10, Issue 1, 2020
Pages: 11 - 18
Review paper
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 10
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 10.10.2020. Review paper

CRISIS: INDIVIDUALLY INTO A COLLECTIVE THROUGH THE PRISM OF ARTISTS

By
Dragana Rađenović
Dragana Rađenović

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Abstract

 Although we live in a time of various viruses, due to the state of emergency of the Covid epidemic, we can ask ourselves what does this disease tell us as a society? Is it a collective detachment from our consumerist illusions imposed by the previous system? Is this disease a metaphysical warning to rethink social standards, or is it just another crisis that needs to pass? By examining the relationship between the two concepts: the concept of identity and the concept of deconstruction, as key to the problematic theme of the crisis, we come to the answer as to why this disease has triggered many other crises within us. By exploring the relationship between artists and crises, as well as artists who have survived Covid, we map various emotions that are a common point of all people regardless of country, race or gender. Crises occur on an individual or social level. At the individual level, they represent a change in a person's normal functioning. At the social level, we see a complex social situation in political, economic, social and cultural systems. ”3 The crisis, in this sense, refers to the problem of identity with the questions posed in his manifesto by Paul Gauguin: “Where are we from? Who are we? Where are we going?". 

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.