Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 10, Issue 1, 2020
Pages: 318 - 324
Review Scientific Paper
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 9
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 10.10.2020. Review Scientific Paper

CUSTOMS UNION IN COMPARATIVE PRACTICE

By
Jelena Latinović ,
Jelena Latinović

Faculty of Law, University PIM , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Mrđan Čolović
Mrđan Čolović

The College of Service Business , Istočno Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

 In the context of historical, economic and contemporary international legal sources, it is revealed that the elements covered by the concept of customs union differ. As a consequence of the conceptual diversity and legal flexibility of the laws of the World Trade Organization - WTO, in practice there is a great diversity of customs union designs - CU. Different CUs approach key design issues and tensions, from on the Preferential Trade Agreement - PTA negotiations to regulating the origin of goods, in different ways. Common to all conceptualizations around CUs is a concern about state sovereignty that affects how CUs are designed and how they operate. Such concerns usually lead to the formation of CUs that are not in line with the idea of a “perfect customs union”. Even if there is no perfect CU, poor performance occurs especially when the relationship between the internal and external aspects of the CU is not synchronized. 

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.