Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 10, Issue 1, 2020
Pages: 437 - 443
Original scientific paper
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 5
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 10.10.2020. Original scientific paper

A PROCESS-ORIENTED MODEL OF LEARNING MOTIVATION IN A HIGH APPLIED STUDIES L2 CLASSROOM

By
Nada Buzadžić Nikolajević
Nada Buzadžić Nikolajević

Academy of Applied Studies Šabac, Unit for Agriculture, Business and Tourism

Abstract

 The question of how to motivate students in ESP teaching is one that does not have a single and simple answer because motivation is an extremely broad and complex construct. This paper relies on Zoltan Dörnyei’s definition of motivational strategies and his process-oriented model of learning motivation in the L2 classroom. It presents the results of a survey aimed at obtaining classroom data on motivational strategies: 111 students of the Academy of Applied Studies Šabac who had all studied and passed English (L2) as an obligatory first-year subject were asked how important they considered a selection of motivational strategies and to what extent they found the application of these strategies effective in creating, generating, maintaining and protecting their motivation for learning L2. Based on their responses, I try to identify the strategies that work best in the described learning/teaching environment and to single out strategies, if any, that tend to be underutilized in the L2 classroom. In addition, I identify whether the motivation orientation that drives the students’ actions is integrative or instrumental. 

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.