Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2016
Pages: 67 - 67
None of above
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 4
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 11.11.2016. None of above

Considerations on stress triaxiality variation for 2P armor steel

By
V Zichil ,
V Zichil

Department of Economical Engineering, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau , Bacau , Romania

A Coseru ,
A Coseru

"Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau , Bacau , Romania

F Nedeff ,
F Nedeff

"Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau , Bacau , Romania

C Tomozei
C Tomozei

Department of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau Romania

Abstract

Stress triaxiality is considered an invariant of stress, defined as the ratio of hydrostatic stress (hydrostatic pressure by other authors) and the equivalent stress (usually calculated using von Mises criterion). If the values of the main three stresses have comparable sizes, stress triaxiality can be also calculated using the first invariant of the stress tensor. Despite that the stress triaxiality is an invariant, the authors have determined experimentally and analytically its variation with the force at the tensile test, but also with the radius of notches caused in the specimen. 2P armor steel being used in lightweight armor, these notches occur after shocks with foreign objects. Furthermore, the authors have revealed the stress triaxiality variation function of the test type. The tests were performed on tensile specimens loaded for tensile test, pure torsion test, 25% tensile - 75% torsion test, 50% tensile - 50% torsion test, 75% tensile - 25% torsion test. The mathematical model used was designed by Xue.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.