Home Archive Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 14, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 45 - 45
Original scientific paper
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 13
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: >> Accepted: >> Published: 09.06.2024. Original scientific paper

METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATION OF SUCCESS OF PRODUCT MARKETING

By
Vučelja Lekić ,
Vučelja Lekić

Faculty of Technical Sciences Čača, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Mladen Janjić ,
Mladen Janjić

Faculty of Technical Sciences Čača, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Nada Damljanović
Nada Damljanović

Faculty of Technical Sciences Čača, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Abstract

 Calculation and measurement of the impact of achieved business results with the contribution of marketing and product branding is a continuous process in every business environment. This type of evaluation is necessary so that management can determine the validity of various marketing concepts focusing on planning adequate marketing strategy in the future. Techniques of fuzzy natural logic and approximate reasoning is used to show methodology for evaluation of product marketing success. Evaluation is based on the analysis of relationship between several business parameters and performance indicators, including product quality, marketing attractiveness, overall sales, etc., by applying a special reasoning method (called perception-based logical deduction), which effectively utilize expert knowledge to evaluate relation between product and marketing and make a decision. 

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.