Home Proceedings Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 14, 2025
Pages: 387 - 392
Original scientific paper
Psychology Editor: Dejan Kojic
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 33
PDF Downloads: 23
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 26.08.2025. Revised: 30.09.2025. >> Accepted: 03.11.2025. >> Published: 21.11.2025. Original scientific paper Psychology Editor: Dejan Kojic

VIRTUAL ROLE MODELS: POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE INFLUENCES ON THE IDENTITY FORMATION OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS?

By
Dajana Bašić ,
Dajana Bašić
Contact Dajana Bašić

Faculty of Psychology, University PIM , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Elvir Ibeljić
Elvir Ibeljić

Public Secondary School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering Lukavac, Public Secondary School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering Lukavac , Lukavac , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

This paper explores the types of role models that children and adolescents form in the digital world and their influence on identity development. Through focus groups involving 110 participants aged 6 to 18, the study analyzed the figures most commonly followed by the participants, including athletes, musicians, and influencers. Special attention was given to the motivations behind following these role models, such as a sense of belonging, identification with a certain lifestyle, humor, or the informational value of the content. The results show that while children are often aware that virtual role models do not represent real life, they still assign them significant importance and form emotional attachments. The study emphasizes the need to strengthen media literacy and to develop a critical attitude toward the content that shapes young people’s identities in the digital environment.

References

Akbaş, G., & Gürsel-Bilgin, L. (2022). YouTube Effect on Adolescence: Exploring the Influences of YouTubers on Adolescents’ Identity Construction. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 18(2), 125–142.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Boričić, M., Petrović, V., & Jovanović, N. (2023). Social media food marketing landscape of children living in Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina: Piloting the WHO CLICK framework. Public Health Nutrition, 26(14), 3121–3132.
Chen, C. (2020). Influencers as role models: The impact of parasocial relationships on adolescents. Journal of Media Psychology, 32(4), 187–199.
Heliyon. (2023). How do social media influencers change adolescents’ behavior? Evidence from Middle East Countries. Heliyon, 9(12), 23301.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.
Li, X., Chen, Y., & Wang, Q. (2024). Social media: A digital social mirror for identity development during adolescence. Current Psychology, 43, 2950–2966.
Marušić, I., Kovačić, T., & Yildirim, D. (2024). Influencer marketing: A cross-cultural study of Generation Z in Croatia and Türkiye. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 34(2), 345–365.
Perić, J., Nikolić, M., & Delić, A. (2021). Analysis of attitudes of Gen Z toward media and consumption: The region of Balkans. Journal of Balkan Studies, 14(3), 55–73.
Stepanović, I. (2009). Uzori mladih: Estrada, sport i vrijednosne orijentacije adolescenata. Psihologija, 42(4), 473–488.
Zivoradović-Ilić, I., Nikitović, J., Blažanin, D., & Mojović Zdravković, D. (2023). Media Figures as Adolescent Role Models: (Dis)similarities between Millennials and Generation Z. Psihološka Istraživanja, 26(2), 243–262.
Zozaya-Durazo, A., Feijoo, S., & Sádaba-Chalezquer, C. (2023). Social Media Influencers Defined by Adolescents. KOME, 11(2), 1–17.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.