Home Program
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 14, 2025
Pages: 55 - 60
Original scientific paper
Economics, Management and Еntrepreneurship Editor: Darjana Sredić
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 426
PDF Downloads: 375
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 20.08.2025. >> Accepted: 18.09.2025. >> Published: 21.11.2025. Original scientific paper Economics, Management and Еntrepreneurship Editor: Darjana Sredić

MODELS FOR ESTIMATING PRODUCTION PHASE DURATION AS A FOUNDATION FOR EFFICIENT PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT

By
Jelena Jovanović ,
Jelena Jovanović
Contact Jelena Jovanović

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Dragana Perišić
Dragana Perišić

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Abstract

In modern manufacturing systems, accurately defining and managing the duration of individual production phases is crucial for achieving high efficiency and reliable delivery timelines. This paper presents two methodologically grounded models for estimating the duration of the production phase: one based on the technological (ideal) cycle, and the other on the projected (realistic) cycle that incorporates organizational and logistical constraints. A case study is provided involving the packaging of a 20 mm round into a crate, part of the production program of the ‘Sloboda’ Co. - Cacak, Serbia.

By analyzing the flow coefficient, defined as the ratio between the actual and ideal/projected cycle durations, potential inefficiencies within the production process can be identified. The results suggest that predefining projected durations for each production phase significantly improves planning accuracy and coordination across the production flow. The proposed models serve as a practical decision-support tool within production management systems.

References

Aouam, T., & Uzsoy, R. (2014). Zero-order production planning models with stochastic demand and workload-dependent lead times. International Journal of Production Research, 53(6), 1661–1679. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.935514
Chincholkar, M., & Herrmann, J. W. (2008). Estimating manufacturing cycle time and throughput in flow shops with process drift and inspection. International Journal of Production Research, 46(24), 7057–7072. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701513893
Dierkes, S., & Siepelmeyer, D. (2024). Material Flow Cost Accounting with Multiple Inefficiency Factors and Recycling. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 77(1), 57–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-024-00197-z
Dong, Y., Zhang, C., Luo, W., Yang, S., & Zhao, G. (2016). Material flow analysis and extrusion die modifications for an irregular and multitooth aluminum alloy radiator. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 85(5–8), 1927–1935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8666-5
Ellis, K. P., Meller, R. D., Wilck, J. H., Parikh, P. J., & Marchand, F. (2010). Effective material flow at an assembly facility. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7195–7217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903186266

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.