Home Proceedings Organization Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 14, 2025
Pages: 217 - 222
Original scientific paper
Computer Sciences Editor: Darjana Sredić
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 65
PDF Downloads: 26
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 22.08.2025. >> Accepted: 18.09.2025. >> Published: 21.11.2025. Original scientific paper Computer Sciences Editor: Darjana Sredić

AN ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE SOURCES IN THE FIELD OF THE INTERNET OF THINGS

By
Darko Radulović ,
Darko Radulović

Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Marija Blagojević
Marija Blagojević
Contact Marija Blagojević

Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak, University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia

Abstract

This research presents an analysis of the application and acceptance of various standards in the field of the Internet of Things (IoT). Employing t-test statistical analysis, the study analyzes differences between groups of standards in three key categories: implementation complexity, adoption level, and citation frequency. The results show that communication and networking standards—such as IEEE 802.15.4, CoAP, and 6LoWPAN—are cited significantly more often and demonstrate higher adoption rates in both scientific literature and industry, compared to architectural and security standards, including IEEE P2413, ISO/IEC 30141, and ISO/IEC 27030. However, no statistically significant differences were found in implementation complexity among the analyzed groups. Based on these findings, the study recommends the continued development and deployment of communication standards, while suggesting that architectural and security standards be enhanced through simplified implementation and stronger integration into industrial solutions. Future research could further examine the influence of various factors on the acceptance and implementation of standards across different industrial sectors.

References

Emsley, D. (2000). Variance analysis and performance: two empirical studies, Accounting. Organizations and Society, 25(1), 1–12.
Kyun, T. (2015). KimT test as a parametric statistic. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 68(6), 540–546.
Miloslavskaya, N., Nikiforov, A., Plaksiy, K., & Tolstoy, A. (2019). Standardization Issues for the Internet of Things. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 328–338). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16184-2_32
Porkodi, R., & Bhuvaneswari, V. (2014). The Internet of Things (IoT) Applications and Communication Enabling Technology Standards, An Overview, 2014. Proceedings International Conference on Intelligent Computing Applications.
Ross, A., & Willson, V. L. (2017). Paired Samples T-Test. In Basic and Advanced Statistical Tests (pp. 17–19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8_4
Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. (2019). Regression Analysis. In Springer Texts in Business and Economics (pp. 209–256). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56707-4_7
Semenick, D. (1990). Tests and measurements The T-test. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal, 12(1), 36–37.
Wagle, S., & Pecero, J. E. (2019). Efforts Towards IoT Technical Standardization. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 524–539). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31831-4_36
Wang, H., Manolas, C., & Xanthidis, D. (2022). Statistical Analysis with Python. In Handbook of Computer Programming with Python.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.